On this stream, Fahad mapped the bitcoin pullback and liquidity sweep strategy live, pinning two specific interest zones at 76.198 and 76.6 after BTC dumped hard. The read was not a blind long: open interest was falling and CVD was tracking lower too. Fahad called it straight away: this looked more like a bearish fakeout than a fresh leg down.
With BlackRock's ETF buying wave eyeing $80,000 and analysts warning of a brutal flush before any sustained rally, context mattered more than the chart alone.
Key Takeaways
- Zones at 76.198 and 76.6 only become entries when the market confirms buyers are defending them, not before.
- When OI and CVD both fall during a dump, the move is more likely position cleanup than a new bearish trend leg.
- Every additional retest of the same level increases the probability of a break, making late entries at that level lower quality.
- Three tools, total volume, delta volume, and OI, gave the team more clarity than any complex indicator setup on stream.
- Risk sizing that feels manageable keeps emotions out of the exit decision, which is where most traders actually lose money.
BTC buy zones sat at 76.198 and 76.6, but only with confirmation
Fahad marked 76.198 and 76.6 as the main Bitcoin interest zones after the dump, but our team did not treat those prices as blind buy levels. The setup required a sweep, a defended low, or a breakout-retest sequence so risk could sit cleanly below structure instead of relying on hope.
Both levels came from the 30-minute candle context after the dump, where the market showed absorption and gave the team a clear invalidation line to work from.
Fahad's preference was the pullback setup, not an aggressive breakout entry. Wait for the market to prove buyers are active at the zone, then enter with the stop below the strong low or sweep low. Real invalidation point, not a prayer.
"I would like to enter the pullback setup," Fahad said on stream.
Bitcoin setup framework discussed on stream
| Scenario | What confirms the trade | Invalidation |
|---|---|---|
| Pullback long near 76.198 to 76.6 | Defended low, absorption visible in volume, buyers step in on the 30-minute | Below the sweep low / strong low |
| Breakout and retest long | Clean breakout above range high, price returns to test and holds | Back inside the range with no buyer response |
| Sweep-high rejection short | Price grabs liquidity above local highs then reverses sharply | Above the swept high with acceptance |
Bitcoin's key weekly support and resistance zones give useful additional context on how these levels fit the broader weekly picture.

Falling OI and CVD pointed to exits, not clean downside aggression
Our team read the move as cleanup, not continuation. Open interest was falling while CVD tracked lower alongside it, and Fahad's read was that traders were closing out rather than pressing fresh shorts, so the dump could become a bearish fakeout instead of a trend leg down.
"The market looks like a good trigger for a bearish fakeout," Fahad said. That call came directly from reading OI and CVD together, not from guessing.
Large seller prints showed up during the move: 3 million, 1 million, and 6 million seller orders. On the surface that looks bearish. But Fahad's read was that sellers showing up in size at those zones could represent absorption rather than fresh aggression, especially when OI is declining at the same time.
Bitcoin open interest collapsing while price drops often signals position liquidation, not new short conviction.
How the team interpreted order-flow context
| Signal | What Fahad inferred |
|---|---|
| OI falling while CVD also falls | Traders exiting existing positions, not building new short exposure |
| 3M, 1M, and 6M seller prints | Possible absorption at the zone rather than trend-confirming aggression |
| No OI expansion on the dump | Lack of new short commitment reduces odds of sustained downside leg |
OI and CVD have to be read together. One without the other gives you half the picture.

Repeated retests weaken levels, so range trades lost quality fast
Price revisiting a level is a warning sign, not a buying opportunity. Our team treated liquidity sweeps of highs and lows as the cleaner idea, while messy range behavior became harder to trust because repeated taps increase the odds of a break and reduce the quality of late entries.
"The more you revisit a specific area, the higher the chances are that you break the area." That is not a vague principle. It is a direct reason to stop taking entries at a level after it has been tested two or three times.
On the stream, Bitcoin had already moved above the volume area high, which supported upside continuation if a proper pullback came. The team tracked several context levels:
- Weekly open and previous week open as structural anchors
- Daily high as the near-term resistance reference
- 78,400 and 77,85.6 as the next areas of interest above
The market kept grinding into the same zone without clean acceptance. Each visit made the next entry less attractive. Fahad put it plainly: messy structure means lower trade quality, and there is no reason to force a position just because a level sits on the chart.
Sweeps of highs and lows remained the preferred setup because they give a clear before-and-after: liquidity gets grabbed, the rejection happens, and the trade has a logical place to be wrong. Trading Bitcoin liquidity levels walks through the same framework in detail.

Fahad rejected chasing tops and tied better entries to simpler tools
One practical rule kept coming up: never buy a market already stretching higher without a pullback or confirmation. Fahad tied that rule to simple tools, arguing that complex charts and flashy indicators often hide weak execution rather than improve it.
"You can't buy at the top. I'm telling you, never ever buy when the market is literally pushing higher." No qualifier, no hedge, just a flat rule.
Fahad keeps exactly three things on screen:
- Total volume
- Delta volume
- Open interest
"Deep charts are messed up, and that's my opinion." He was specifically critical of AI-generated indicators and overcomplicated overlays that traders use to signal credibility rather than gain edge. His point about bots: "A bot is basically a reflection of you." If the trader's understanding of market conditions is poor, the bot just executes that misunderstanding faster.
Fahad's price action insights cover this stripped-down methodology in depth.

Patience and smaller risk mattered more than predicting every move
Fahad's closing message was risk-first. If risk feels too large, emotions take over and exits become random, which is how most traders bleed accounts slowly rather than in one blow. One core strategy is enough, provided traders wait for confirmation and size positions they can actually hold.
"Hope will never make you profitable." That line came after a viewer was sitting in a losing position waiting for the market to come back. Hope is not a trade plan.
The practical framework:
- $20 loss on a trade should feel manageable, not catastrophic
- If you are risking $50 and losing sleep, the size is wrong
- Targets of 1:2 are realistic; 1:5 is achievable but needs patience and the right setup
- "One of your core strategies is more than enough," provided it is executed with discipline
The 11 a.m. stream timing came up too. Fahad acknowledged that the morning session often has dead action, and that forcing trades during low-volatility windows is one of the most common ways traders blow risk for no reason. How to execute trading exits effectively covers exactly how to hold through chop without abandoning a valid setup.

What the stream actually taught, stripped to the essentials:
- Zones are not entries. 76.198 and 76.6 were interest levels. The trade required the market to prove something at those levels first.
- Falling OI plus falling CVD means read the context. It does not automatically mean buy or sell. It means traders are exiting, and that changes the interpretation of the dump.
- Repeated retests degrade quality. The more a level gets touched, the less edge a new entry at that level carries.
- Simple tools beat complicated ones. Total volume, delta volume, OI. Three inputs. The rest is noise.
- One strategy, executed with patience and correct risk sizing, is enough. Forcing trades in dead sessions is not discipline, it is impatience dressed up as activity.
If you want to watch these reads happen in real time, join the Hitpoint community for live market coverage and real-time trade alerts. The analysis runs every session. Come see how the team builds these setups from scratch.
Watch the full stream: Bitcoin Pullback and Liquidity Sweep Strategy on YouTube
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not investment advice. Crypto assets are unregulated in India, are highly volatile, and can lose value rapidly; there is no established investor-protection or grievance-redressal mechanism for them. Trading With Sidhant LLP is not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst, and nothing here constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Income from virtual digital assets is taxable in India at 30% plus applicable cess, with 1% TDS on transfers. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research before trading.
Frequently Asked Questions
- How do we trade a Bitcoin pullback after a liquidity sweep?
- Wait for the sweep to complete, then watch for the market to defend the swept level with visible buying in volume and a candlestick structure that gives a clear invalidation point below. Fahad's approach on stream was to mark the 76.198 to 76.6 zone, wait for a pullback into it, and only enter once buyers showed up in size rather than buying into the sweep itself.
- What does it mean when open interest and CVD fall together on Bitcoin?
- It means traders are closing existing positions rather than opening aggressive new shorts. Fahad's read on stream was that falling OI alongside falling CVD points to a cleanup move, not a fresh bearish trend leg. That context is what made the dump look like a potential fakeout rather than a continuation signal, even with large seller prints visible.
- Why did Fahad prefer a pullback entry instead of buying the breakout?
- A pullback gives a cleaner invalidation level and confirmation that buyers are actually active at the zone. Buying a breakout means chasing price that has already moved, which compresses the reward-to-risk ratio and forces a wider stop. Fahad said it plainly on stream: you can't buy at the top, and a pullback entry avoids exactly that problem.
- How many times can Bitcoin retest a level before the level weakens?
- There is no fixed number, but Fahad's rule is directional: each additional retest increases the probability of a break. The logic is that every visit to a level consumes the resting orders sitting there. Once those orders are absorbed, the level has less defense. Our team used this to avoid late entries at zones that had already been touched multiple times during the session.
- How should we size risk when the setup looks good but the market is messy?
- Reduce size or skip the trade entirely. Fahad's framework is that risk should feel manageable before you enter, not after. If a $50 risk creates anxiety, the size is wrong for the account. He used a $20 loss example on stream to illustrate that comfortable risk sizing keeps emotions out of exit decisions, which is where most traders actually lose money in choppy conditions.
Share this post
Bitcoin Liquidity Sweep and Reclaim Strategy at 79,800
Fahad called the 77,000 to 81,000 Bitcoin pump fake because open interest never confirmed it. Here is the 79,800 sweep plan.
5 Nov 2026
How to Trade Supply and Demand Zones With a 1:2 Target
One hourly zone, one 15-minute trigger and a Bitcoin short that reversed at exactly 1:2, explained with petrol prices.
4 Nov 2026
How to Exit a Winning Bitcoin Trade Without Getting Greedy
Fahad's bearish Bitcoin read came with one rule: a running $10,000 profit is no reason to move the stop.
3 Nov 2026
Join our Telegram community.
Get post alerts, trading discussions, and market updates.
Get post alerts in your inbox.
New blog post? We'll email you. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.