Fahad waited for bearish follow-through after Bitcoin swept local liquidity, then warned that VWAP and a prior low could limit the short.

Fahad saw Bitcoin sweep local liquidity, then waited for bearish follow-through before taking a short. The sweep alone was not an entry. That distinction is central to how to trade a bitcoin liquidity sweep. Earlier on 2 October, a separate reclaim-based buy plan had worked as he expected. Later, VWAP and a prior low gave our team reasons to watch the short's exit as closely as its entry. Fahad's rule for the day was 'Data, logic, and zero assumption.' His oil plan, which never triggered, showed what that rule looked like when the answer was no trade.
Fahad had called for Bitcoin to reclaim a level before a buy, and he said price followed that plan. The short he took later was a separate decision. We did not hear a clear reclaim price, entry or target on the stream, so the useful detail was the condition, not a number to copy.
A good call did not authorize the next trade. Fahad's reaction to the reclaim was immediate: 'I got it! Exactly what I wanted.' Later, our team had a different setup to assess.
The 15-minute Bitcoin chart below shows candles across the stream window, with its start and end marked. It does not mark Fahad's unstated reclaim level. For another example of why a marked area still needs a condition, our Bitcoin value-area confirmation discussion covers that distinction.
Fahad described Bitcoin sweeping local liquidity, followed by bearish price action. He then named a further candle trigger for a short. VWAP and a nearby prior low were potential obstacles, so we could not read the setup as an open-ended move lower. He was looking toward local lows and liquidity, without stating a target price.
The trigger was the current candle losing its low. Fahad put it conditionally on the stream: 'One liquidity sweep, a good follow-through. If the current candle loses its low, you can enter short.' The sweep identified a location. The bearish response and candle low gave him something to test before entering.
We heard no clear Bitcoin short entry or target price. Adding one after the fact would change the account of the stream. Published chart ideas can combine a liquidity sweep with order blocks and Fibonacci, but Fahad's call depended on the candle response and the nearby levels.
Late arrivals faced a different decision. Fahad said, 'The Bitcoin train left a little early. It left on time for us.' Our team took that as a warning against chasing after the entry condition had passed, particularly on Friday. The Bitcoin pullback and liquidity-sweep discussion also separates where a move occurs from when a trader enters.
Fahad had marked an oil short that required a bearish candle close. That close never came, so he did not take the planned entry. He later took a separate short, described its setup as legitimate and said it was stopped out. We have to keep those decisions apart: one never triggered, while the other became a losing trade.
A marked level was a plan, not permission. 'If the entry doesn't get triggered, you can't enter the trade,' Fahad told viewers. A level break without the required close did not satisfy his first plan, even while price was moving.
The two oil short decisions
| Setup | Required or observed trigger | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Planned oil short | Required bearish candle close did not occur | No entry on that plan |
| Separate oil short | Fahad described a later setup as legitimate; exact entry was not clear | Trade taken and stopped out; exact stop price was not clear |
Fahad mentioned three take-profit levels for oil, but their prices were not audible. We also heard no clear entry or stop price for the trade he took. That leaves us with his decision process and the outcome he reported, not a priced trade record.
The 15-minute oil chart below shows the stream window with start and end marked. It does not supply the missing trade prices. Our guide to confirmation in trading explains the difference between a planned level and an entry condition. A stopped-out trade can still have followed its rules. An untriggered plan was never a trade.
Fahad reported that his gold short reached TP1 and that its stop was at breakeven. For Bitcoin, he offered two choices after TP1: move the stop to breakeven, or take partial profit and retain the original stop. Silver looked shortable to him, but he did not announce or take a trade. We kept reported actions separate from his advice.
Friday made profit protection more pressing. With the weekend approaching, Fahad cautioned against getting greedy. On Bitcoin, VWAP and a nearby prior low gave him specific reasons to question how far the short could travel without interruption.
Trade status and risk decisions discussed on Friday
| Instrument | Reported status | Risk decision or constraint |
|---|---|---|
| Gold | Short reached TP1 | Stop moved to breakeven; no exact entry, target or stop price was given |
| Bitcoin | Fahad took a short | After TP1, he advised breakeven or partial profit with the original stop; VWAP and a prior low remained obstacles |
| Silver | Possible short discussed | No trade announced or taken |
Fahad initially wanted candle confirmation on gold because the higher-timeframe picture looked strange. Later, he reported that the short was active and TP1 had been reached. The stream did not give exact gold prices, and we cannot tell from the chart where he entered.
The 15-minute gold chart below shows candles across the stream window, with start and end marked. It does not mark Fahad's entry or TP1. Our trading exit strategies discussion goes further on the choice between securing a partial profit and adjusting a stop.
Fahad said the trades shown came from price action, although he also uses footprint and order-flow tools. His pre-trade checks were the market trend, a logical or proven strategy, and the actual entry trigger. We can use volume data to add context, but it cannot stand in for the candle confirmation he required on the setups discussed.
Simple did not mean entering without a condition. Fahad gave viewers his sequence: 'First, check the market trend. Secondly, confirm that you have an effective or proven strategy. And third, identify the trigger.' His example of a 30-minute range with 15-minute confirmation split the chart read into decisions a trader could make before the move.
FRVP helped him locate where volume had concentrated, pointing to potential support, resistance or buyer and seller interest. Footprint, CVD and open interest needed context as well. Fahad compared those inputs to ingredients in a dish: one ingredient alone would not tell him how it would taste. Our footprint delta discussion covers the risk of reading an isolated figure.
Other market commentary has considered deleveraging alongside Ethereum strength and Bitcoin scenarios. That broader context did not provide the trigger for Fahad's trade. For practice, he recommended reviewing 50 to 100 trades to find repeated entry patterns and weaknesses.
Fahad waited through the Bitcoin sweep for bearish follow-through, then named the candle condition for a short. We also had to account for VWAP and the prior low, neither of which disappeared because the entry looked good. The oil decisions made the distinction harder to miss: one planned short lacked its required close, while a separate trade was taken and stopped out. On Friday, protecting an open trade mattered more to Fahad than holding out for an unstated target. As he put it, 'No fancy stuff, no pink-circle strategy, no blue-box strategy.' Join the Hitpoint community for live market coverage and real-time trade alerts.
Watch the full stream: How to Trade a Bitcoin Liquidity Sweep With Confirmation on YouTube
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not investment advice. The price levels, setups and trades described are a review of market events that have already occurred, shared to illustrate a method of analysis rather than to recommend any trade. Trading With Sidhant LLP is not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst, and nothing here constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Investments in securities markets are subject to market risks; read all the related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please consult a SEBI-registered financial adviser before acting on any information in this article.
Share this post

How to Read Bitcoin Open Interest and CVD Before 87,000
Rising CVD supported Fahad's Bitcoin upside bias, but a later drop in open interest changed what the buying meant.

How to Trade Bitcoin Liquidity Sweeps Near 81,900
Bitcoin swept both sides of its range, but Fahad wanted an 81,900 reclaim to buy or a confirmed VWAP loss to short.

Bitcoin Liquidity Sweep Trading Strategy: TP1 and Stops
A Bitcoin short reached TP1, but the bigger lesson came from the trailing stop that ended the trade.
Get post alerts in your inbox.
New blog post? We'll email you. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Join our Telegram community.
Get post alerts, trading discussions, and market updates.